Sunday, May 23, 2004
White Sox Times Comments Archive, May 2004
Comments For:
5/23/2004
Reinsdorf Hatred
1.
It took eight years for my dad to forgive baseball in general for the players’
strike and go back to Comiskey. He was happy about the U.S. Cellular deal because
it keeps the Sox in the city for another eight years.
While I don’t exactly *like* Reinsdorf I think there are other Chicago team owners
who are much more deserving of our wrath, like Mr. Wirtz.
Comment by soze — 5/23/2004 @ 9:00 am
2.
What might be interesting at some point is if you could actually come up with some independent thoughts and provide
analysis, instead of trolling White Sox fan sites and lamely harpooning their stories. I sense your submissions are
nothing more than an outlet for your personal agenda vs. anyone who has rejected your stories (Scalise)or moderated
your behavior (Laffer).
Note to the author: Do you have anything interesting to add, other than using this forum as an attempt to “one up”
anyone who has crossed your path?
Note to Admin: Am I the only one who sees this pattern?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/23/2004 @ 9:18 am
Comments For:
5/22/2004
What Goes Around, Comes Around
1.
What actually happened was that you started the whole mess by initiating a lengthy diatribe on SoxTalk, trashing
Scalise in public, when the professional/classy thing to do would have been to handle it in private. And here you
are, continuing the rant as if you’re some sort of vindicated profesional writer. It’s my opinion, and it’s shared
by dozens of others, that you continue to show a lack of class by penning such childish pieces. But don’t worry, what
goes around, comes around. This article has been archived for possible use at a later date.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/23/2004 @ 9:10 am
Comments For:
5/21/2004
White Sox Win Shares
1.
And the significance of this is?
How about some analysis?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/22/2004 @ 9:54 am
2.
I thought that the readers would find this info interesting. As for analysis, my personal opinion is that Win Shares is a lot of nonsense as is most things that have to do with sabermetrics and Bill James in particular. Any analysis is left to the indivudual reader.
Comment by Charles Rector — 5/22/2004 @ 3:49 pm
3.
Personal opinion is not the same thing as analysis. What makes an article interesting vs. a
simple statistics column is the author taking the time to explain Win Shares and comment on
why they exist. A readers role is to comment on the authors analysis, not to provide the
analysis. A good author should dig a little deeper and give a little more effort rather
than simply posting stats.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/23/2004 @ 10:57 am
Comments For:
5/21/2004
Buehrle’s Recent Wins In Perspective
1.
Buehrle’s pitching line in these games speaks for itself. First, a massive offensive output
wasn’t needed in any of the three - he pitched that well. Second, name me ANY pitcher who
doesn’t relax more when their offense supports them. Lastly, you haven’t commented on his
strikeout rate, which is clearly getting better. He is in a groove, there is no reason why
you shouldn’t give him his just due. Unless, of course, your personal biases are preventing
you from doing so.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/22/2004 @ 9:53 am
Comments For:
5/19/2004
White Sox Pitching Stats
1.
Rector, what is your point here? Stats are easily located at the main White Sox site, why
is it necessary to regurgitate them here? Just curious.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/20/2004 @ 1:43 pm
2.
But its a hassle for folks to look around the Official Site for those stats and it makes it more convenient for visitors to the WST to periodically see updated pitching stats. Remember, pitching is 70% of the game.
Comment by Charles Rector — 5/21/2004 @ 3:12 pm
3.
It really isn’t a hassle to check stats, it’s in the paper frequently, but ok. I guess the
point is: If this blog is intended to be, shall we say, “free form and opinionated” as I’ve
been told, shouldn’t we see a deeper level of analysis from the writer vs. a simple
regurgitation of stats? A reader views the author as an “expert”, and expects a journalism
professional to offer more than the same info offered up in numerous publications, both
online and offline. The author should challenge himself to offer added value to the reader.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/21/2004 @ 3:41 pm
Comments For:
5/19/2004
My Take On The Blackhawks News
1.
Why is Yawney “bush league”? Cassidy and Yawney are, in fact, friends. In addition, they
highly respect one another. Cassidy’s NHL coaching career was extemely short, why do you
state he is accomplished as an NHL coach? He was fired from Washington due to his inability
to bond with players. Are you stating that Yawney is “bush league” in order to start an
argument of some sort?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/20/2004 @ 1:46 pm
Comments For:
5/18/2004
Cotts The New 5th Starter?
1.
You conveniently ignore Cotts’ stellar record as a starter in the minor leagues. Once again,
you are pushing your personal agenda while ignoring facts. Cotts has had significant minor
league success as a starter - in fact, much better than Adkins.
Try telling the WHOLE story Rector, instead of whatever suits your agenda. Evan, are any of
Rectors stories ever checked for “balance” before they’re posted?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/19/2004 @ 9:39 am
2.
No. I know nothing about the White Sox, and we try to give all writers free rein.
Comment by admin — 5/19/2004 @ 10:11 am
3.
Well, you guys certainly have given him free reign, to your detriment. A simple glance at
Cotts’ record and BA’s assessment of his potential as a starter pokes major holes in Rectors
story. Sorry admin - there is a serious credibility problem here. It
starts and ends with Rector.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/19/2004 @ 11:03 am
4.
Just wondering, but what is this “agenda” that you speak of? And why is it that you construe any difference of opinion on such matters as Neal Cotts’s suitability as starting pitcher as being some sort of heresy that you have to stomp out, whitesoxfanalways aka chuckles aka JimH?
Comment by Charles Rector — 5/19/2004 @ 4:58 pm
Comments For:
5/18/2004
The Myth of Ozzieball
1.
No, Guillen is not a buffoon, but Rector has a personal agenda. An agenda that includes only
looking at 1/2 a story, 1/2 the facts, and then spinning them into whatever way is convenient
for his limited knowledge viewpoint. Guillen preaches more aggressive baseball than Manuel.
He is less than 40 games into his managerial career, using roughly the same cast of players
who were used to playing a different style. Manuel was more station-to-station, waiting for
the long ball. The White Sox won one division title in 6 years with good talent. Sorry
Rector, I think someone other than Ozzie Guillen is the buffoon … perhaps you?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/19/2004 @ 9:43 am
Comments For:
5/18/2004
Kobe Bryant in Perspective
1.
Aren’t YOU the media? If so, I agree 100% with your last statement.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/18/2004 @ 1:04 pm
Comments For:
5/15/2004
The Media Bias Against the Sox and in Favor of the Cubs
1.
Interesting point you make about that Wrigley field has more crime in it’s half mile radius than the cell. Citizen ICAM of the Chicago Police says that there was 52 reported crimes in the past two weeks by Wrigley, and 31 by the Cell. Then again, you have to consider that Wrigley is a more densley populated area than the Cell.
Comment by spudart — 5/15/2004 @ 12:58 pm
Comments For:
5/13/2004
Secret Guidelines
1.
Wow … it’s too bad WSI is run by troll-moderators. I am flabbergasted as to why they vilified you over that.
Comment by Evan — 5/13/2004 @ 8:17 am
2.
I love WSI, but I HATE the moderators. I’ve been called a troll and a Cubs fan (by moderators!) because I’ve dared to say that, maybe, possibly, JR isn’t evil. I didn’t even say I liked the guy, I said that I understood his thinking, but apparently that isn’t allowed. I still hang around and read, sometimes even post, but I try to avoid the moderators as much as possible.
Comment by Adam — 5/13/2004 @ 9:56 am
3.
I’d like to ask the author why he seems to have so many problems at so many different fan forums?
Is it possible it’s the author’s (Rectors) fault?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/17/2004 @ 11:57 am
Comments For:
5/12/2004
The Uncanny Similarity Between Mark Buehrle And Mark Prior
1.
As usual, several flaws in your statements. One, for all intents and purposed Prior was a
rookie last year, so with very little experience it may indeed have been shortsighted to use
him so much. On the other hand, Buehrle had four years of experience coming into 2004, and
had far and away his heaviest workload under your personal favorite, Jerry Manuel. Second,
you’re comparing apples and oranges in his ERA - a fair comparison is his ERA thus far in
2004 vs. his ERA after the same number of starts last year. Third, exactly what/where/who are
the Sox fans who describe Buehrle as either “indestructable” or “impregnable”? I’m a season
ticket holder and I know of no such commentary inferring or outright stating that Buehrle is
not susceptible to injury. Rector … where are you coming up with some of these statements??
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/12/2004 @ 2:36 pm
2.
WhiteSoxFanAlways,
I would have to say that the White Sox fans he speaks of are ones that he talks to, not you.
I would also remind you that this blog is not meant to be written objectively. This is a subjective blog. The writers are free to express their own opinion.
You do, however, make a point. Perhaps Mr. Rector should amend his column to include “some White Sox fans think…”
Comment by Evan Brunell — 5/12/2004 @ 5:20 pm
3.
Evan, then he should state it’s his opinion, instead of stating things as if they’re fact.
I’ve commented on several articles where he does just that. It’s Journalism 101 - if it’s
your opinion, make sure the reader knows that. I understand the clear difference between
subjectivity and fact.
Lastly, as a season ticket holder, I talk to dozens and dozens of Sox fans. Dare I say, more
than Mr. Rector. Many, if not most, have expressed concern with Buerhle’s well-being. Sox fans
are an astute bunch and generally don’t like it when a columnist broad brushes their thoughts,
particularly when they aren’t accurate … in my opinion (see how easy it is to say that??)
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/12/2004 @ 6:01 pm
Comments For:
5/12/2004
Felix Diaz Called Up As Sox #5 Starter
1.
You state his best pitch is the slider. It is not, it’s his fastball which up until recently,
he lacked the ability to command on both sides of the plate. Read Ken Williams comments in
the Chicago papers today, he states the slider is “improving”. It is certainly not his best
pitch. Where did you find that the slider is his best weapon???
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/12/2004 @ 2:29 pm
Comments For:
5/12/2004
Press Release: Joliet 8, Schaumburg 6
1.
Not to be nitpicky, but this has nothing to do with the White Sox. In my opinion, if this is
the White Sox Times, articles should be about the White Sox, not a minor league team that’s
not affiliated with the White Sox in any way. There are plenty of White Sox topics, if a
little research is done.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/12/2004 @ 10:33 am
2.
These are Chicago area professional baseball teams and both Chicago MLB teams scout these local teams fairly heavily.
Comment by Charles Rector — 5/12/2004 @ 11:23 am
3.
I concur. We have told all writers not to feel limited by the name or team. They can write about anything, but want an emphasis on the White Sox.
Comment by admin — 5/12/2004 @ 11:48 am
4.
Well, now I know, thank you very much. Perhaps a name change is in order? “The Chicago Area
Professional Baseball Teams Times”? Better yet, “Rector’s Fancy”? (just kidding on that last
one Evan).
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/12/2004 @ 2:39 pm
Comments For:
5/10/2004
Brian Anderson
1.
Where did you learn that a promotion for Brian Anderson is widely expected?
He’s coming off a troublesome injury and has already skipped a level of pro ball.
A promotion may occur, but it’s far from “widely expected”. I base this on a personal
discussion with Dave Wilder, White Sox minor league personnel boss.
Where do you get your information from, or is this merely your OPINION vs. something that is
“widely expected”?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/10/2004 @ 6:07 pm
Comments For:
5/10/2004
Sox vs. Twins For AL Central Championship
1.
What is the clear difference between the manager of the Twins and the manager of the White Sox this year? Is it the usage of the starting pitchers?
Comment by Evan — 5/10/2004 @ 8:09 am
2.
Use of starting pitchers and also the fact that Gardenhire seems to have the ability to get his guys to continually give it their 110% best effort and his guys deliver in clutch situations. Also, Ron Gardenhire is very good in the strategy and tactics of the game.
Comment by Charles Rector — 5/10/2004 @ 6:58 pm
Comments For:
5/8/2004
Did Sox Blunder With Troy Cameron Release?
1.
Are you aware that Troy Cameron has a shoulder problem, which is a big reason why he was
released? Further, did you realize there’s a huge difference between Joliet, an independent
league team, and professional baseball? Just because some acquaintance of the writer(?) saw
him play doesn’t mean the guy is a good fielder at the professional level.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/9/2004 @ 5:47 pm
2.
You say that fielding has become a problem with the White Sox since Guillen took over.
Prove it.
Lose the Guillen hate, it’s way too obvious.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/9/2004 @ 5:48 pm
3.
You’re right when you say Cameron is “not your ordinary prospect”. He’s less than ordinary,
and that’s the reason he’s not become a major leaguer in 7+ years.
Why on earth would any writer with any level of credibility be bringing up some marginal
minor league 3B and suggest the White Sox may have made a mistake? That’s just ludicrous.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/9/2004 @ 5:50 pm
4.
Being a native of Joliet, and having seen Troy play, I know what a great player he truly is.
It is easy to belittle someone if you have not witnessed their talent for yourself. Not only
was he great on the field, he was genuine off the field, with a passion for this game that few
major league players exhibit. It is the Sox loss.
Comment by Melissa Honiotes — 5/18/2004 @ 10:45 am
Comments For:
5/8/2004
An In-Depth Look at the Declining Effectiveness of Mark Buehrle
1.
Hitters were hitting .306 off of him prior to his last start against the Orioles. Due to his 7 innings of shutout baseball in that start, his BAA is now down to .288. It dropped 18 points in 1 start.
I think that paints a pretty good picture of how you should take stats this early in the season with a grain of salt.
Comment by witesoxfan — 5/13/2004 @ 4:01 pm
Comments For:
5/8/2004
Dennis Ulacia Southern League Pitcher of the Week
1.
Unfortunately, no. Ulacia wasn’t even rated in Baseball America’s Top 30 Sox Prospects this
year, and last year came in between 25-30. His star has been on the decline since after the
2001 season, his best as a pro. Within the organization, there have been serious concerns
about his conditioning (he’s always had a weight problem), work ethic, and coachability.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/10/2004 @ 9:07 am
2.
I believe that Ulacia is a hard worker and through his talent, that is able to be proved. He has the ability to becaome one of the best pithcers in the major leagues. This season seems to be going in the right direction for Ulacia so good luck to him.
Comment by Robert — 5/14/2004 @ 1:39 pm
Comments For:
5/7/2004
Is Something Wrong With Wright?
1.
Who says Williams and Wright both wanted him (Wright) to be a reliever?
Back it up, quote please.
You won’t find one, because I chatted with Williams in spring training, he wanted Wright to
compete for a starter spot. Where on earth are you pulling these assumptions from? Are you
stating your opinion as fact? If you are, that’s weak journalism.
Wright himself wants to be a starter. I didn’t hear this directly from Wright, but from his
wife - whom I’d say is a pretty credible source. Much better than you, apparantly.
You make statements which are opinions but you pose them as hard facts. What journalism
school taught you to do that? I’d ask for my money back if I were you, you got ripped off.
Comments For:
5/3/2004
“Who’s The Real Troll Here?” Update
1.
Rector, calling you an idiot is truly understating things. You whine about wanting to be
treated as a professional, yet you continually rip on moderators and anyone else who sees
through your agenda. What’s next for you … coming up with another board name again, so you
can “defend” yourself? That’s one reason why you are persona non grata at 3 different fan
sites. LOL crectorset, keep talking to yourself over here … it suits you!
Comment by Chuckles — 5/3/2004 @ 10:57 am
2.
I happen to think Mr. Rector is doing just fine. He is logging plenty of hits and as for his agenda — well, EVERYONE has an agenda. Some people’s agenda is not liking Nomar, for instance, while others don’t like Terry Francona.
He’s doing just fine. I’ve been keeping up with the White Sox boards to keep an eye on how the moderators treated people - thank god I’m not a White Sox fan.
The moderators at SOSH and WEC are great. They don’t ban people for hating on managers and whatnot.
Anyways, just wanted to say my piece.
Comment by Evan — 5/3/2004 @ 11:48 am
3.
To my knowledge, Rector isn’t banned for hating managers, etc. He got chased off of one site because he was trapped
in a lie … he made up a new user name for himself, and proceeded to defend CRector (himself!). He denied it but the
ISP was tracked, and ‘ol Charles got busted. This, from a guy who decries the fact that people on the internet aren’t
accountable for their behavior. LOL Crectorset, you’ve built your castle on sand, yet again! There isn’t an ounce of
CRe-dibility in CRe-ctor.
Comment by Chuckles — 5/3/2004 @ 12:00 pm
5/23/2004
Reinsdorf Hatred
1.
It took eight years for my dad to forgive baseball in general for the players’
strike and go back to Comiskey. He was happy about the U.S. Cellular deal because
it keeps the Sox in the city for another eight years.
While I don’t exactly *like* Reinsdorf I think there are other Chicago team owners
who are much more deserving of our wrath, like Mr. Wirtz.
Comment by soze — 5/23/2004 @ 9:00 am
2.
What might be interesting at some point is if you could actually come up with some independent thoughts and provide
analysis, instead of trolling White Sox fan sites and lamely harpooning their stories. I sense your submissions are
nothing more than an outlet for your personal agenda vs. anyone who has rejected your stories (Scalise)or moderated
your behavior (Laffer).
Note to the author: Do you have anything interesting to add, other than using this forum as an attempt to “one up”
anyone who has crossed your path?
Note to Admin: Am I the only one who sees this pattern?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/23/2004 @ 9:18 am
Comments For:
5/22/2004
What Goes Around, Comes Around
1.
What actually happened was that you started the whole mess by initiating a lengthy diatribe on SoxTalk, trashing
Scalise in public, when the professional/classy thing to do would have been to handle it in private. And here you
are, continuing the rant as if you’re some sort of vindicated profesional writer. It’s my opinion, and it’s shared
by dozens of others, that you continue to show a lack of class by penning such childish pieces. But don’t worry, what
goes around, comes around. This article has been archived for possible use at a later date.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/23/2004 @ 9:10 am
Comments For:
5/21/2004
White Sox Win Shares
1.
And the significance of this is?
How about some analysis?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/22/2004 @ 9:54 am
2.
I thought that the readers would find this info interesting. As for analysis, my personal opinion is that Win Shares is a lot of nonsense as is most things that have to do with sabermetrics and Bill James in particular. Any analysis is left to the indivudual reader.
Comment by Charles Rector — 5/22/2004 @ 3:49 pm
3.
Personal opinion is not the same thing as analysis. What makes an article interesting vs. a
simple statistics column is the author taking the time to explain Win Shares and comment on
why they exist. A readers role is to comment on the authors analysis, not to provide the
analysis. A good author should dig a little deeper and give a little more effort rather
than simply posting stats.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/23/2004 @ 10:57 am
Comments For:
5/21/2004
Buehrle’s Recent Wins In Perspective
1.
Buehrle’s pitching line in these games speaks for itself. First, a massive offensive output
wasn’t needed in any of the three - he pitched that well. Second, name me ANY pitcher who
doesn’t relax more when their offense supports them. Lastly, you haven’t commented on his
strikeout rate, which is clearly getting better. He is in a groove, there is no reason why
you shouldn’t give him his just due. Unless, of course, your personal biases are preventing
you from doing so.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/22/2004 @ 9:53 am
Comments For:
5/19/2004
White Sox Pitching Stats
1.
Rector, what is your point here? Stats are easily located at the main White Sox site, why
is it necessary to regurgitate them here? Just curious.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/20/2004 @ 1:43 pm
2.
But its a hassle for folks to look around the Official Site for those stats and it makes it more convenient for visitors to the WST to periodically see updated pitching stats. Remember, pitching is 70% of the game.
Comment by Charles Rector — 5/21/2004 @ 3:12 pm
3.
It really isn’t a hassle to check stats, it’s in the paper frequently, but ok. I guess the
point is: If this blog is intended to be, shall we say, “free form and opinionated” as I’ve
been told, shouldn’t we see a deeper level of analysis from the writer vs. a simple
regurgitation of stats? A reader views the author as an “expert”, and expects a journalism
professional to offer more than the same info offered up in numerous publications, both
online and offline. The author should challenge himself to offer added value to the reader.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/21/2004 @ 3:41 pm
Comments For:
5/19/2004
My Take On The Blackhawks News
1.
Why is Yawney “bush league”? Cassidy and Yawney are, in fact, friends. In addition, they
highly respect one another. Cassidy’s NHL coaching career was extemely short, why do you
state he is accomplished as an NHL coach? He was fired from Washington due to his inability
to bond with players. Are you stating that Yawney is “bush league” in order to start an
argument of some sort?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/20/2004 @ 1:46 pm
Comments For:
5/18/2004
Cotts The New 5th Starter?
1.
You conveniently ignore Cotts’ stellar record as a starter in the minor leagues. Once again,
you are pushing your personal agenda while ignoring facts. Cotts has had significant minor
league success as a starter - in fact, much better than Adkins.
Try telling the WHOLE story Rector, instead of whatever suits your agenda. Evan, are any of
Rectors stories ever checked for “balance” before they’re posted?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/19/2004 @ 9:39 am
2.
No. I know nothing about the White Sox, and we try to give all writers free rein.
Comment by admin — 5/19/2004 @ 10:11 am
3.
Well, you guys certainly have given him free reign, to your detriment. A simple glance at
Cotts’ record and BA’s assessment of his potential as a starter pokes major holes in Rectors
story. Sorry admin - there is a serious credibility problem here. It
starts and ends with Rector.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/19/2004 @ 11:03 am
4.
Just wondering, but what is this “agenda” that you speak of? And why is it that you construe any difference of opinion on such matters as Neal Cotts’s suitability as starting pitcher as being some sort of heresy that you have to stomp out, whitesoxfanalways aka chuckles aka JimH?
Comment by Charles Rector — 5/19/2004 @ 4:58 pm
Comments For:
5/18/2004
The Myth of Ozzieball
1.
No, Guillen is not a buffoon, but Rector has a personal agenda. An agenda that includes only
looking at 1/2 a story, 1/2 the facts, and then spinning them into whatever way is convenient
for his limited knowledge viewpoint. Guillen preaches more aggressive baseball than Manuel.
He is less than 40 games into his managerial career, using roughly the same cast of players
who were used to playing a different style. Manuel was more station-to-station, waiting for
the long ball. The White Sox won one division title in 6 years with good talent. Sorry
Rector, I think someone other than Ozzie Guillen is the buffoon … perhaps you?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/19/2004 @ 9:43 am
Comments For:
5/18/2004
Kobe Bryant in Perspective
1.
Aren’t YOU the media? If so, I agree 100% with your last statement.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/18/2004 @ 1:04 pm
Comments For:
5/15/2004
The Media Bias Against the Sox and in Favor of the Cubs
1.
Interesting point you make about that Wrigley field has more crime in it’s half mile radius than the cell. Citizen ICAM of the Chicago Police says that there was 52 reported crimes in the past two weeks by Wrigley, and 31 by the Cell. Then again, you have to consider that Wrigley is a more densley populated area than the Cell.
Comment by spudart — 5/15/2004 @ 12:58 pm
Comments For:
5/13/2004
Secret Guidelines
1.
Wow … it’s too bad WSI is run by troll-moderators. I am flabbergasted as to why they vilified you over that.
Comment by Evan — 5/13/2004 @ 8:17 am
2.
I love WSI, but I HATE the moderators. I’ve been called a troll and a Cubs fan (by moderators!) because I’ve dared to say that, maybe, possibly, JR isn’t evil. I didn’t even say I liked the guy, I said that I understood his thinking, but apparently that isn’t allowed. I still hang around and read, sometimes even post, but I try to avoid the moderators as much as possible.
Comment by Adam — 5/13/2004 @ 9:56 am
3.
I’d like to ask the author why he seems to have so many problems at so many different fan forums?
Is it possible it’s the author’s (Rectors) fault?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/17/2004 @ 11:57 am
Comments For:
5/12/2004
The Uncanny Similarity Between Mark Buehrle And Mark Prior
1.
As usual, several flaws in your statements. One, for all intents and purposed Prior was a
rookie last year, so with very little experience it may indeed have been shortsighted to use
him so much. On the other hand, Buehrle had four years of experience coming into 2004, and
had far and away his heaviest workload under your personal favorite, Jerry Manuel. Second,
you’re comparing apples and oranges in his ERA - a fair comparison is his ERA thus far in
2004 vs. his ERA after the same number of starts last year. Third, exactly what/where/who are
the Sox fans who describe Buehrle as either “indestructable” or “impregnable”? I’m a season
ticket holder and I know of no such commentary inferring or outright stating that Buehrle is
not susceptible to injury. Rector … where are you coming up with some of these statements??
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/12/2004 @ 2:36 pm
2.
WhiteSoxFanAlways,
I would have to say that the White Sox fans he speaks of are ones that he talks to, not you.
I would also remind you that this blog is not meant to be written objectively. This is a subjective blog. The writers are free to express their own opinion.
You do, however, make a point. Perhaps Mr. Rector should amend his column to include “some White Sox fans think…”
Comment by Evan Brunell — 5/12/2004 @ 5:20 pm
3.
Evan, then he should state it’s his opinion, instead of stating things as if they’re fact.
I’ve commented on several articles where he does just that. It’s Journalism 101 - if it’s
your opinion, make sure the reader knows that. I understand the clear difference between
subjectivity and fact.
Lastly, as a season ticket holder, I talk to dozens and dozens of Sox fans. Dare I say, more
than Mr. Rector. Many, if not most, have expressed concern with Buerhle’s well-being. Sox fans
are an astute bunch and generally don’t like it when a columnist broad brushes their thoughts,
particularly when they aren’t accurate … in my opinion (see how easy it is to say that??)
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/12/2004 @ 6:01 pm
Comments For:
5/12/2004
Felix Diaz Called Up As Sox #5 Starter
1.
You state his best pitch is the slider. It is not, it’s his fastball which up until recently,
he lacked the ability to command on both sides of the plate. Read Ken Williams comments in
the Chicago papers today, he states the slider is “improving”. It is certainly not his best
pitch. Where did you find that the slider is his best weapon???
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/12/2004 @ 2:29 pm
Comments For:
5/12/2004
Press Release: Joliet 8, Schaumburg 6
1.
Not to be nitpicky, but this has nothing to do with the White Sox. In my opinion, if this is
the White Sox Times, articles should be about the White Sox, not a minor league team that’s
not affiliated with the White Sox in any way. There are plenty of White Sox topics, if a
little research is done.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/12/2004 @ 10:33 am
2.
These are Chicago area professional baseball teams and both Chicago MLB teams scout these local teams fairly heavily.
Comment by Charles Rector — 5/12/2004 @ 11:23 am
3.
I concur. We have told all writers not to feel limited by the name or team. They can write about anything, but want an emphasis on the White Sox.
Comment by admin — 5/12/2004 @ 11:48 am
4.
Well, now I know, thank you very much. Perhaps a name change is in order? “The Chicago Area
Professional Baseball Teams Times”? Better yet, “Rector’s Fancy”? (just kidding on that last
one Evan).
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/12/2004 @ 2:39 pm
Comments For:
5/10/2004
Brian Anderson
1.
Where did you learn that a promotion for Brian Anderson is widely expected?
He’s coming off a troublesome injury and has already skipped a level of pro ball.
A promotion may occur, but it’s far from “widely expected”. I base this on a personal
discussion with Dave Wilder, White Sox minor league personnel boss.
Where do you get your information from, or is this merely your OPINION vs. something that is
“widely expected”?
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/10/2004 @ 6:07 pm
Comments For:
5/10/2004
Sox vs. Twins For AL Central Championship
1.
What is the clear difference between the manager of the Twins and the manager of the White Sox this year? Is it the usage of the starting pitchers?
Comment by Evan — 5/10/2004 @ 8:09 am
2.
Use of starting pitchers and also the fact that Gardenhire seems to have the ability to get his guys to continually give it their 110% best effort and his guys deliver in clutch situations. Also, Ron Gardenhire is very good in the strategy and tactics of the game.
Comment by Charles Rector — 5/10/2004 @ 6:58 pm
Comments For:
5/8/2004
Did Sox Blunder With Troy Cameron Release?
1.
Are you aware that Troy Cameron has a shoulder problem, which is a big reason why he was
released? Further, did you realize there’s a huge difference between Joliet, an independent
league team, and professional baseball? Just because some acquaintance of the writer(?) saw
him play doesn’t mean the guy is a good fielder at the professional level.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/9/2004 @ 5:47 pm
2.
You say that fielding has become a problem with the White Sox since Guillen took over.
Prove it.
Lose the Guillen hate, it’s way too obvious.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/9/2004 @ 5:48 pm
3.
You’re right when you say Cameron is “not your ordinary prospect”. He’s less than ordinary,
and that’s the reason he’s not become a major leaguer in 7+ years.
Why on earth would any writer with any level of credibility be bringing up some marginal
minor league 3B and suggest the White Sox may have made a mistake? That’s just ludicrous.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/9/2004 @ 5:50 pm
4.
Being a native of Joliet, and having seen Troy play, I know what a great player he truly is.
It is easy to belittle someone if you have not witnessed their talent for yourself. Not only
was he great on the field, he was genuine off the field, with a passion for this game that few
major league players exhibit. It is the Sox loss.
Comment by Melissa Honiotes — 5/18/2004 @ 10:45 am
Comments For:
5/8/2004
An In-Depth Look at the Declining Effectiveness of Mark Buehrle
1.
Hitters were hitting .306 off of him prior to his last start against the Orioles. Due to his 7 innings of shutout baseball in that start, his BAA is now down to .288. It dropped 18 points in 1 start.
I think that paints a pretty good picture of how you should take stats this early in the season with a grain of salt.
Comment by witesoxfan — 5/13/2004 @ 4:01 pm
Comments For:
5/8/2004
Dennis Ulacia Southern League Pitcher of the Week
1.
Unfortunately, no. Ulacia wasn’t even rated in Baseball America’s Top 30 Sox Prospects this
year, and last year came in between 25-30. His star has been on the decline since after the
2001 season, his best as a pro. Within the organization, there have been serious concerns
about his conditioning (he’s always had a weight problem), work ethic, and coachability.
Comment by whitesoxfanalways — 5/10/2004 @ 9:07 am
2.
I believe that Ulacia is a hard worker and through his talent, that is able to be proved. He has the ability to becaome one of the best pithcers in the major leagues. This season seems to be going in the right direction for Ulacia so good luck to him.
Comment by Robert — 5/14/2004 @ 1:39 pm
Comments For:
5/7/2004
Is Something Wrong With Wright?
1.
Who says Williams and Wright both wanted him (Wright) to be a reliever?
Back it up, quote please.
You won’t find one, because I chatted with Williams in spring training, he wanted Wright to
compete for a starter spot. Where on earth are you pulling these assumptions from? Are you
stating your opinion as fact? If you are, that’s weak journalism.
Wright himself wants to be a starter. I didn’t hear this directly from Wright, but from his
wife - whom I’d say is a pretty credible source. Much better than you, apparantly.
You make statements which are opinions but you pose them as hard facts. What journalism
school taught you to do that? I’d ask for my money back if I were you, you got ripped off.
Comments For:
5/3/2004
“Who’s The Real Troll Here?” Update
1.
Rector, calling you an idiot is truly understating things. You whine about wanting to be
treated as a professional, yet you continually rip on moderators and anyone else who sees
through your agenda. What’s next for you … coming up with another board name again, so you
can “defend” yourself? That’s one reason why you are persona non grata at 3 different fan
sites. LOL crectorset, keep talking to yourself over here … it suits you!
Comment by Chuckles — 5/3/2004 @ 10:57 am
2.
I happen to think Mr. Rector is doing just fine. He is logging plenty of hits and as for his agenda — well, EVERYONE has an agenda. Some people’s agenda is not liking Nomar, for instance, while others don’t like Terry Francona.
He’s doing just fine. I’ve been keeping up with the White Sox boards to keep an eye on how the moderators treated people - thank god I’m not a White Sox fan.
The moderators at SOSH and WEC are great. They don’t ban people for hating on managers and whatnot.
Anyways, just wanted to say my piece.
Comment by Evan — 5/3/2004 @ 11:48 am
3.
To my knowledge, Rector isn’t banned for hating managers, etc. He got chased off of one site because he was trapped
in a lie … he made up a new user name for himself, and proceeded to defend CRector (himself!). He denied it but the
ISP was tracked, and ‘ol Charles got busted. This, from a guy who decries the fact that people on the internet aren’t
accountable for their behavior. LOL Crectorset, you’ve built your castle on sand, yet again! There isn’t an ounce of
CRe-dibility in CRe-ctor.
Comment by Chuckles — 5/3/2004 @ 12:00 pm
